Booth v. Barnes

The Superior Court of New York City

Booth v. Barnes

5 Rob. 640

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided August 31, 1866·Published

Opinion

Before Robertson, Ch. J.

Where a defendant is in close custody at the'time of entering up judgment against him, but admitted to the jail liberties within three months thereafter, and is again surrendered into close custody by his bondsmen, he is not entitled to be discharged from custody upon the ground of the failure of the plaintiff to charge him in execution, (2 22. 8. 556, $ 88,) until three months after his surrender.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Before Robertson, Ch. J.

Where a defendant is in close custody at the'time of entering up judgment against him, but admitted to the jail liberties within three months thereafter, and is again surrendered into close custody by his bondsmen, he is not entitled to be discharged from custody upon the ground of the failure of the plaintiff to charge him in execution, (2 22. 8. 556, $ 88,) until three months after his surrender.

Booth v. Barnes, 5 Rob. 640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1866).

Pincite

5 Rob. 640 (Booth v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.