Boot & Shoe Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melrose Orthodox Congregational Society
This text of 117 Mass. 199 (Boot & Shoe Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melrose Orthodox Congregational Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rulings at the trial were entirely correct, and in accordance with the principles of law as announced by this [201]*201court in Commonwealth v. Massachusetts Insurance Co. 112 Mass 116 ; and Cumings v. Sawyer, ante, 30. The by-law relating to the surrender of policies does not apply to cases where the assured has suffered a total loss.
Upon the facts stated in the bill of exceptions, the judge rightly ruled that the defendant could maintain no defence to the action.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 Mass. 199, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boot-shoe-manufacturers-mutual-fire-insurance-v-melrose-orthodox-mass-1875.