Boot & Shoe Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melrose Orthodox Congregational Society

117 Mass. 199, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 190
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 12, 1875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wells, J.

The rulings at the trial were entirely correct, and in accordance with the principles of law as announced by this [201]*201court in Commonwealth v. Massachusetts Insurance Co. 112 Mass 116 ; and Cumings v. Sawyer, ante, 30. The by-law relating to the surrender of policies does not apply to cases where the assured has suffered a total loss.

Upon the facts stated in the bill of exceptions, the judge rightly ruled that the defendant could maintain no defence to the action.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boot & Shoe Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melrose Orthodox Congregational Society, 117 Mass. 199, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 190 (Mass. 1875).

117 Mass. 199 (Boot & Shoe Manufacturers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melrose Orthodox Congregational Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Welch
31 N.E. 712 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)