Boose v. O'Brien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 2011
Docket10-6935
StatusUnpublished

This text of Boose v. O'Brien (Boose v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boose v. O'Brien, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6935

PHILLIP E. BOOSE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN TERRY A. O’BRIEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00286-gec-mfu)

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip E. Boose, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Boose, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Boose v. O’Brien, No.

7:10-cv-00286-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. June 30, 2010). Boose’s motion

for an evidentiary hearing is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boose v. O'Brien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boose-v-obrien-ca4-2011.