Boose v. O'Brien
This text of Boose v. O'Brien (Boose v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6935
PHILLIP E. BOOSE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TERRY A. O’BRIEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00286-gec-mfu)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip E. Boose, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Phillip E. Boose, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Boose v. O’Brien, No.
7:10-cv-00286-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. June 30, 2010). Boose’s motion
for an evidentiary hearing is denied. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boose v. O'Brien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boose-v-obrien-ca4-2011.