Boose v. Drew

Fourth Circuit

Boose v. Drew

298 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2008·No. No. 08-7127·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Boose, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boose v. Drew, No. 4:08-cv-01954-CMC, 2008 WL 2557438 (D.S.C. June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Boose, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boose v. Drew, No. 4:08-cv-01954-CMC, 2008 WL 2557438 (D.S.C. June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Boose v. Drew, 298 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

298 F. App'x 285 (Boose v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related