Boos v. Field

192 A.D. 696, 183 N.Y.S. 482, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 192 A.D. 696 (Boos v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boos v. Field, 192 A.D. 696, 183 N.Y.S. 482, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

John M. Kellogg, P. J.:

The trial justice set aside the verdict in favor of the defendant on the ground that it was not fairly sustained by the evidence and because he erroneously submitted the plaintiff’s contributory ’ negligence to the jury. A trial justice has a supervisory power over a verdict. He has seen the witnesses and is in the atmosphere of the trial, and ordinarily this court will not disturb his discretion in setting aside a verdict as not sustained by the evidence.

The plaintiff 'was leading a two-year-old bull along a public highway, with an ordinary halter, consisting of a rope around the neck with a half-hitch over the nose. The plaintiff had [697]*697hold of the end of the rope, about eighteen feet fiom the bull’s head. They were upon the right-hand side of the road, the plaintiff following the bull. He had not led the bull before and did not know how he would act. Defendant's automobile, approaching from the rear, frightened the bull; he suddenly dashed across the road. The plaintiff held onto the rope and was dragged after the bull, with the result that the plaintiff was injured by a collision with the automobile.

We conclude from all the evidence that it was not error to submit the question of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence to the jury. The order is affirmed, with costs and printing disbursements to abide the event.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kligman v. City of New York
281 A.D. 93 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Lawson v. Fordyce
21 N.W.2d 69 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1945)
Coleman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
252 A.D. 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hogan v. Franken
221 A.D. 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Weber v. Steingart
219 A.D. 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Leversee v. Neidermyer
219 A.D. 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Colbourn v. New York Central Railroad
214 A.D. 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D. 696, 183 N.Y.S. 482, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boos-v-field-nyappdiv-1920.