Boone Waste Management v. Carman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boone Waste Management v. Carman

881 So. 2d 94, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12473, 2004 WL 1877374

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-2504

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 881 So. 2d 94 (Boone Waste Management v. Carman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boone Waste Management v. Carman, 881 So. 2d 94, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12473, 2004 WL 1877374 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier and the claimant in this workers’ compensation case challenge various aspects of the final order entered by the judge of compensation claims. Although the judge erred in failing to authorize the employer/carrier to take a crédit in the amount of temporary partial disability benefits already paid for the period of January 1, 2001 through February 25, 2001, against amounts payable for temporary total disability benefits awarded for that same period of time, we otherwise find no error in the order under review. Accordingly, except as to the failure to authorize the credit, the order is affirmed, and this case is remanded for the judge to authorize an appropriate credit.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier and the claimant in this workers’ compensation case challenge various aspects of the final order entered by the judge of compensation claims. Although the judge erred in failing to authorize the employer/carrier to take a crédit in the amount of temporary partial disability benefits already paid for the period of January 1, 2001 through February 25, 2001, against amounts payable for temporary total disability benefits awarded for that same period of time, we otherwise find no error in the order under review. Accordingly, except as to the failure to authorize the credit, the order is affirmed, and this case is remanded for the judge to authorize an appropriate credit.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 So. 2d 94, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12473, 2004 WL 1877374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-waste-management-v-carman-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack