Boone v. Tipton
This text of 15 Ind. 270 (Boone v. Tipton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit by Tipton against Boone to recover a tract of land. Becovery below. The land, forty acres, worth about $250, was owned by one Piohens. He devised it to one Wonsetter on the condition subsequent, that Wonsetter should support Hannah Brown during her life.
Wonsetter commenced furnishing Hannah her support. While being so supported, Hannah married one Mann, left Wonsetter, “and refused to receive his aid.” There is no evidence that Wonsetter ever refused to provide for Hannah. Hannah, claiming ■ to be the heir of Piohens, and further, that the condition lor her support was broken, sold and conveyed the land to Tipton. Wonsetter had before conveyed to Boone. . • -
Supposing Hannah to be the heir of Pickens, still it would seem that she could not convey, in this case, till after entry upon the land for condition broken. 'See the cases cited in Leach v. Leach, 10 Ind. 271, and in Strong v. Clem, 12 id. 37. But passing by this point, it is clear that the evidence makes no case for Tipton. Hannah waived performance of the condition. This branch of the case is covered Petro v. Cassiday, 13 Ind. 289.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ind. 270, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-tipton-ind-1860.