Boone v. State

182 S.W.3d 692, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 68, 2006 WL 92817
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 2006
DocketED 86175
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 S.W.3d 692 (Boone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boone v. State, 182 S.W.3d 692, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 68, 2006 WL 92817 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Ronnie Boone, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Howell
182 S.W.3d 692 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 S.W.3d 692, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 68, 2006 WL 92817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-state-moctapp-2006.