Boone v. State

853 S.E.2d 118, 310 Ga. 651
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 2020
DocketS21A0171
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 853 S.E.2d 118 (Boone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boone v. State, 853 S.E.2d 118, 310 Ga. 651 (Ga. 2020).

Opinion

310 Ga. 651 FINAL COPY

S21A0171. BOONE v. THE STATE.

MELTON, Chief Justice.

On May 10, 2012, Odeirrick Boone entered a non-negotiated

guilty plea to malice murder and various other offenses in

connection with the robbery of a convenience store and the stabbing

death of the store owner, Balk Sung. On January 31, 2020, Boone

filed a pro se motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal, arguing

that his trial counsel was ineffective for having failed to inform him

of his right to pursue an appeal of his convictions. The trial court

denied Boone’s motion summarily and without holding a hearing,

which prompted the current appeal. For the reasons that follow, and

as the State properly concedes, the trial court’s order must be

vacated and this case remanded to the trial court to hold a hearing

to determine whether Boone is entitled to an out-of-time appeal due

to the ineffective assistance of his plea counsel.

“A criminal defendant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal if his counsel’s constitutionally deficient performance deprived him of an

appeal of right that he otherwise would have pursued.” Collier v.

State, 307 Ga. 363, 364 (1) (834 SE2d 769) (2019). Where

the constitutional violation alleged by the defendant is ineffective assistance of counsel in providing advice about or acting upon an appeal of right [such as an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered on a guilty plea], that violation is reviewed under the familiar standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SCt 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984). [Cit.] To meet his burden of proving that counsel’s ineffectiveness deprived him of his right to an appeal, the criminal defendant must show (1) that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) that counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. [Cit.]

(Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 364-365 (1).

However, with regard to the deficient performance prong of the

Strickland test, “we cannot determine whether [Boone’s] counsel

performed deficiently in failing to file a notice of appeal because the

trial court failed to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue.”

Blackwell v. State, 306 Ga. 577, 578 (832 SE2d 352) (2019).

Accordingly, we must vacate the trial court’s order denying Boone’s

motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand this case to the trial

2 court for a determination of whether counsel performed deficiently

in failing to inform Boone of his right to a direct appeal from his

guilty plea. See Collier, supra, 307 Ga. at 376 (3).

With respect to the prejudice prong of the Strickland test, we

emphasize that to be granted an out-of-time appeal Boone need not

prove that he would have prevailed in a timely appeal, but only that

“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s deficient

failure to consult with him about an appeal, he would have timely

appealed.” Ringold v. State, 304 Ga. 875, 881 (823 SE2d 342) (2019)

(quoting Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U. S. 470, 484 (II) (B) (3) (120 SCt

1029, 145 LE2d 985) (2000)). See also Blackwell, supra, 306 Ga. at

578; Collier, supra, 307 Ga. at 365 (1).

We therefore vacate the trial court’s order denying Boone’s

motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand this case to the trial

court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Blackwell,

supra, 306 Ga. at 578.

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. Nahmias, P. J., and Boggs, Peterson, Bethel, Ellington, and McMillian, JJ., concur. Warren, J., not participating.

3 DECIDED DECEMBER 21, 2020. Murder. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Barwick. Odeirrek D. Boone, pro se. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Lyndsey H. Rudder, Richard B. Caplan, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Meghan H. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. State
868 S.E.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 S.E.2d 118, 310 Ga. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-state-ga-2020.