Boone v. Queen

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Boone v. Queen

2 D.C. 371

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedApril 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 371 (Boone v. Queen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boone v. Queen, 2 D.C. 371 (circtddc 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

[372]*372This instruction the Court refused to give, but instructed the jury that if they should be satisfied by the evidence that the plaintiff fraudulently instructed E. B. C. to draw a bond differing materially from the agreement of the parties, and that the bond so drawn did so differ, and that by means of the delivery of the bond so obtained by the fraud of the plaintiff he obtained possession of the said note, the plaintiff could not recover in this action.

To which refusal, the defendant took a bill of exceptions.

Verdict for the plaintiff. No writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[372]*372This instruction the Court refused to give, but instructed the jury that if they should be satisfied by the evidence that the plaintiff fraudulently instructed E. B. C. to draw a bond differing materially from the agreement of the parties, and that the bond so drawn did so differ, and that by means of the delivery of the bond so obtained by the fraud of the plaintiff he obtained possession of the said note, the plaintiff could not recover in this action.

To which refusal, the defendant took a bill of exceptions.

Verdict for the plaintiff. No writ of error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 D.C. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-queen-circtddc-1823.