Boone v. Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp.

525 S.W.3d 214, 2017 WL 3597017, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 803
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2017·No. No. ED 105325·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corporation (“Employer") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), which found that Angela Boone was not disqualified from unemployment benefits after her termination from Employer because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Commission’s order was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boone v. Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp., 525 S.W.3d 214, 2017 WL 3597017, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

525 S.W.3d 214 (Boone v. Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.