Boone v. OHA

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Boone v. OHA

347 Or. App. 124

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 11, 2026

DocketA185803

StatusUnpublished

This text of 347 Or. App. 124 (Boone v. OHA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boone v. OHA, 347 Or. App. 124 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

124 February 11, 2026 No. 96

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Bradley Lynn BOONE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 24CN04150; 24CN04151; A185803 (Control), A185804

Rebecca D. Guptill, Judge. Submitted January 22, 2026. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Interim Deputy Attorney General, and Jose Garcia-Fuerte, Assistant attorney General, filed the brief for appellant. Laura Graser waived briefing for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, Kamins, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 347 Or App 124 (2026) 125

PER CURIAM This is a consolidated appeal in which the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) and the Oregon State Hospital (OSH) appeal judgments holding them in contempt of court and imposing monetary sanctions based on their failure to admit plaintiff for restoration treatment at OSH within seven days of the court’s order to admit plaintiff. As OHA and OSH point out, this case not materially distinguish- able from Lopez v. Oregon State Hospital, 342 Or App 190, 196-99, 575 P3d 1061 (2025), in which we reversed a similar contempt judgment based on our conclusion that the record established “as a matter of law, the affirmative defense of inability to comply, under ORS 33.055(1).” For the same rea- sons as in Lopez, we reverse the judgments on appeal. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

124 February 11, 2026 No. 96

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Bradley Lynn BOONE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 24CN04150; 24CN04151; A185803 (Control), A185804

Rebecca D. Guptill, Judge. Submitted January 22, 2026. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Interim Deputy Attorney General, and Jose Garcia-Fuerte, Assistant attorney General, filed the brief for appellant. Laura Graser waived briefing for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, Kamins, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 347 Or App 124 (2026) 125

PER CURIAM This is a consolidated appeal in which the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) and the Oregon State Hospital (OSH) appeal judgments holding them in contempt of court and imposing monetary sanctions based on their failure to admit plaintiff for restoration treatment at OSH within seven days of the court’s order to admit plaintiff. As OHA and OSH point out, this case not materially distinguish- able from Lopez v. Oregon State Hospital, 342 Or App 190, 196-99, 575 P3d 1061 (2025), in which we reversed a similar contempt judgment based on our conclusion that the record established “as a matter of law, the affirmative defense of inability to comply, under ORS 33.055(1).” For the same rea- sons as in Lopez, we reverse the judgments on appeal. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

347 Or. App. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-oha-orctapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack