Boone v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Boone v. . Jones

81 S.E. 760, 166 N.C. 222

DecidedApril 29, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.E. 760 (Boone v. . Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boone v. . Jones, 81 S.E. 760, 166 N.C. 222 (N.C. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action to recover a mule, and from a judgment in favor of the interpleader, Cheek, the plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff claims under a mortgage executed by Hiram Jones, and the interpleader by purchase from the same party, and the real controversy is one of fact as to whether the mule bought is the one described in the mortgage.

This has been settled against the plaintiff by the verdict, and we find no error in the trial justifying a reversal of the judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action to recover a mule, and from a judgment in favor of the interpleader, Cheek, the plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff claims under a mortgage executed by Hiram Jones, and the interpleader by purchase from the same party, and the real controversy is one of fact as to whether the mule bought is the one described in the mortgage.

This has been settled against the plaintiff by the verdict, and we find no error in the trial justifying a reversal of the judgment.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.E. 760, 166 N.C. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-jones-nc-1914.