Boone v. Jones
81 S.E. 1135, 166 N.C. 223, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 376
Opinion
The plaintiff claims under a mortgage executed by Hiram Jones, and the interpleader by purchase from the-same party, and th^ real controversy is one of fact as to whether the mule bought is the one described in the mortgage.
This has been settled against the plaintiff by the verdict, and we find no error in the trial justifying a reversal of the judgment.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boone v. Jones, 81 S.E. 1135, 166 N.C. 223, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 376 (N.C. 1914).
81 S.E. 1135 (Boone v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.