Boone v. Hickey

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 2006
Docket05-7606
StatusUnpublished

This text of Boone v. Hickey (Boone v. Hickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boone v. Hickey, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7606

SHIRLEY J. BOONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-1143-1)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 4, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shirley J. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Shirley J. Boone, a federal prisoner, filed a petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), challenging the validity of her

conviction and sentence and raising a claim under United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Though the district court accepted

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and construed the § 2241

petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), Boone clearly

intended to file a § 2241 petition. Boone argues on appeal that

§ 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of her

detention, contending that her claims should be considered in the

context of her § 2241 petition. Because Boone does not meet the

standard set forth in In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir.

2000), we affirm the denial of relief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boone v. Hickey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-hickey-ca4-2006.