Boone v. Harrell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2008·No. 08-6508·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6508

KERRY BOONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARRELL, MDII; B. PARRIS, MDII; ALBRITTON, Sergeant; LOWE, Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00619-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 2, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kerry Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kerry Boone appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Boone v. Harrell,

No. 2:06-cv-00619-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2008). We deny

Boone’s motions for subpoenas and his motion to produce tape

recorded interviews. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boone v. Harrell, (4th Cir. 2008).

Boone v. Harrell (Boone v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related