Boone v. Harrell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6508
KERRY BOONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARRELL, MDII; B. PARRIS, MDII; ALBRITTON, Sergeant; LOWE, Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00619-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 2, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kerry Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kerry Boone appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Boone v. Harrell,
No. 2:06-cv-00619-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2008). We deny
Boone’s motions for subpoenas and his motion to produce tape
recorded interviews. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boone v. Harrell (Boone v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.