Boone v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'n

Sixth Circuit

Boone v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'n

85 F.2d 616, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4202

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1936

DocketNo. 6916

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F.2d 616 (Boone v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boone v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'n, 85 F.2d 616, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4202 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that, by agreement between a bank and its depositor, bonds were to be purchased by the bank and charged to the depositor’s account, which was at all times adequate to cover their cost, that the bonds were purchased, were registered in the depositor’s name, but were received at the bank after it had passed into the hands of a receiver, that, though ample time had intervened between purchase and delivery, yet no debit had been entered against the deposit on the books of the bank.

It is our view that no question arises as to the character of the deposit as a special deposit, but that the issue is solely in respect to the ownership of the bonds, that upon this issue the rule of Blakey v. Brinson, 286 U.S. 254, 52 S.Ct. 516, 76 L.Ed. 1089, 82 A.L.R. 1288, is not applicable, but that the decree adjudging ownership of the bonds to be in the depositor should be affirmed on authority of McNair v. Davis, 68 F.(2d) 935 (C.C.A. 5), certiorari denied 292 U.S. 647, 54 S.Ct. 780, 78 L.Ed. 1497. Cf. Messick v. Rardin (D.C.Ill.) 6 F.Supp. 200, and it is so ordered.

Decree of District Court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that, by agreement between a bank and its depositor, bonds were to be purchased by the bank and charged to the depositor’s account, which was at all times adequate to cover their cost, that the bonds were purchased, were registered in the depositor’s name, but were received at the bank after it had passed into the hands of a receiver, that, though ample time had intervened between purchase and delivery, yet no debit had been entered against the deposit on the books of the bank.

It is our view that no question arises as to the character of the deposit as a special deposit, but that the issue is solely in respect to the ownership of the bonds, that upon this issue the rule of Blakey v. Brinson, 286 U.S. 254, 52 S.Ct. 516, 76 L.Ed. 1089, 82 A.L.R. 1288, is not applicable, but that the decree adjudging ownership of the bonds to be in the depositor should be affirmed on authority of McNair v. Davis, 68 F.(2d) 935 (C.C.A. 5), certiorari denied 292 U.S. 647, 54 S.Ct. 780, 78 L.Ed. 1497. Cf. Messick v. Rardin (D.C.Ill.) 6 F.Supp. 200, and it is so ordered.

Decree of District Court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 616, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-v-american-veterinary-medical-assn-ca6-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack