Boone, Charles Kevin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 3, 2002
Docket14-02-00855-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Boone, Charles Kevin v. State (Boone, Charles Kevin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boone, Charles Kevin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion filed October 3, 2002

Dismissed and Opinion filed October 3, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00855-CR

CHARLES KEVIN BOONE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 866,746

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant pled guilty to robbery on August 1, 2002.  In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to three years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice--Institutional Division.  Because we have no jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss. 


To invoke an appellate court=s jurisdiction over an appeal, an appellant must give timely and proper notice of appeal.  White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).  Appellant filed a timely general notice of appeal that did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3).  Rule 25.2(b)(3) provides that when an appeal is from a judgment rendered on a defendant=s plea of guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal must:  (1) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect; (2) specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial; or (3) state that the trial court granted permission to appeal.  Id.  The time for filing a proper notice of appeal has expired; thus appellant may not file an amended notice of appeal to correct jurisdictional defects.  State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).  Because appellant=s notice of appeal did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3), we are without jurisdiction to consider any of appellant=s issues, including the voluntariness of the plea.  See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (holding that appellant who files general notice of appeal may not appeal voluntariness of negotiated plea). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed October 3, 2002.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Frost.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
61 S.W.3d 424 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
State v. Riewe
13 S.W.3d 408 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boone, Charles Kevin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boone-charles-kevin-v-state-texapp-2002.