Boon Bros. v. Noonburg
This text of 153 A. 98 (Boon Bros. v. Noonburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An application was made by petition to compel obedience to a peremptory writ of mandamus issued out of and under the seal of the court on October 20th, 1930. Proceedings to punish for contempt for disobedience of a writ of mandamus are by attachment, rule to show cause, or other process, and the proceedings are governed by the rules applicable in contempt proceedings generally. 38 O. J. 939. The practice in this state is to issue and serve personally a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be attached for contempt. Brown v. Rahway, 53 N. J. L. 156, 161. See, also, Butler Co. v. Pittsburg, &c., 298 Pa. 347; 148 Atl. Rep. 504.
A rule to show cause will issue on petition filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A. 98, 9 N.J. Misc. 138, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boon-bros-v-noonburg-nj-1931.