Boomhower v. State
648 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 1995 WL 17635
This text of 648 So. 2d 325 (Boomhower v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boomhower v. State, 648 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 1995 WL 17635 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Hicks v. State, 559 So.2d 1265 (Fla.3d DCA 1990) (negotiated plea agreement sufficient basis for departure sentence that fell within statutory limit). This affirmance is without prejudice to the State to apply to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment of conviction on Count III.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hicks v. State
559 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
648 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 1995 WL 17635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boomhower-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.