Boomhower, Inc. v. John Maktos, Administrator of the Estate of George O'hanides, Deceased

D.C. Circuit

Boomhower, Inc. v. John Maktos, Administrator of the Estate of George O'hanides, Deceased

214 F.2d 279, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 424, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2688

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 10, 1954

Docket11971

StatusPublished

This text of 214 F.2d 279 (Boomhower, Inc. v. John Maktos, Administrator of the Estate of George O'hanides, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boomhower, Inc. v. John Maktos, Administrator of the Estate of George O'hanides, Deceased, 214 F.2d 279, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 424, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2688 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

214 F.2d 279

94 U.S.App.D.C. 424

BOOMHOWER, Inc., appellant
v.
John MAKTOS, Administrator of the Estate of George
O'Hanides, Deceased, appellee.

No. 11971.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 17, 1954.
Decided June 10, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Thaddeus G. Benton, New York City, for appellant. Mr. William F. McDonnell, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. David L. Riordan, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WASHINGTON, and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff lessee appeals from a judgment for the defendant lessor in a suit for alleged breach of warranty. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI