Boomhower

Court of Claims

Boomhower

181 Ct. Cl. 1197, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 173, 1967 WL 1580

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 27, 1967

DocketNo. 261-66; No. 262-66

StatusPublished

This text of 181 Ct. Cl. 1197 (Boomhower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boomhower, 181 Ct. Cl. 1197, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 173, 1967 WL 1580 (cc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian fay; overtime fay; limitation of actions. — Plaintiffs sue to recover overtime, holiday and night pay claimed [1198]*1198due them for work performed while employed by the Fish and Wildlife Service of the United States Department of the Interior. The period covered by Mr. Boomhower’s petition is August 1, 1955, to December 31,1957, and by Mr. Brevig’s petition is January 1,1954, to December 31, 1956. Defendant has moved to dismiss both petitions filed in 1966 as barred by the six year statute of limitations applicable to suits in this court, 28 U.S.C. § 2501. Upon consideration thereof, together with plaintiffs’ opposition and without oral argument, the court concluded that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and on October 27, 1967, the court ordered that the petitions be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian fay; overtime fay; limitation of actions. — Plaintiffs sue to recover overtime, holiday and night pay claimed [1198]*1198due them for work performed while employed by the Fish and Wildlife Service of the United States Department of the Interior. The period covered by Mr. Boomhower’s petition is August 1, 1955, to December 31,1957, and by Mr. Brevig’s petition is January 1,1954, to December 31, 1956. Defendant has moved to dismiss both petitions filed in 1966 as barred by the six year statute of limitations applicable to suits in this court, 28 U.S.C. § 2501. Upon consideration thereof, together with plaintiffs’ opposition and without oral argument, the court concluded that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and on October 27, 1967, the court ordered that the petitions be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 Ct. Cl. 1197, 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 173, 1967 WL 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boomhower-cc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack