Bookman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bookman v. State

59 S.W.2d 133, 123 Tex. Crim. 374, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 12, 1933

DocketNo. 15947

StatusPublished

This text of 59 S.W.2d 133 (Bookman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bookman v. State, 59 S.W.2d 133, 123 Tex. Crim. 374, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence heard before the trial court it not brought up for review. The indictment appears regular and regularly presented.

There are no bills of exception making complaint of the procedure in the trial court. There are exceptions to the charge of the court, but the absence of the facts precludes the appraisement of the complaints.

In the absence of knowledge of the facts that were before the court, the complaint of the argument of counsel for the state presented in the motion for new trial cannot be made the basis of a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI