Bookman v. New York El. R. R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Bookman v. New York El. R. R. Co.

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 11, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (Bookman v. New York El. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bookman v. New York El. R. R. Co., 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

McAdam, J.

The judgment appealed from fixes the fee and rental damage-to the plaintiff’s property and awards the usual injunction in case of non-payment.

The main objection urged by the appellants to the judgment, is that the-awards are excessive and not justified by the evidence. To prove this, the appellants’ counsel have made an anaylsis showing the values and rentals of the property in question and comparisions are made with other property in the vicinity. These subjects were all considered by Ihe trial justice in arriving at the result he reached, and were no doubt carefully weighed by him in his-review of the evidence.

The case seems to have been carefully tried, the evidence satisfactorily sustains the result arrived at, and as we find no' error in the rulings or the judgment, it follows'that there must be an affirmance, with costs.

Freedman, and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdam, J.

The judgment appealed from fixes the fee and rental damage-to the plaintiff’s property and awards the usual injunction in case of non-payment.

The main objection urged by the appellants to the judgment, is that the-awards are excessive and not justified by the evidence. To prove this, the appellants’ counsel have made an anaylsis showing the values and rentals of the property in question and comparisions are made with other property in the vicinity. These subjects were all considered by Ihe trial justice in arriving at the result he reached, and were no doubt carefully weighed by him in his-review of the evidence.

The case seems to have been carefully tried, the evidence satisfactorily sustains the result arrived at, and as we find no' error in the rulings or the judgment, it follows'that there must be an affirmance, with costs.

Freedman, and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bookman-v-new-york-el-r-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.