Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Booker v. State

Booker v. State

260 So. 3d 252
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2018·No. CASE NO.: 2D18-3994·Published

Opinion

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed because the records of the lower tribunal indicate that the petitioner is represented by counsel. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003). Petitioner may challenge this conclusion by filing a motion for rehearing, under oath, within 15 days of the date of this order.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booker v. State, 260 So. 3d 252 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

260 So. 3d 252 (Booker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)