Booker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Booker v. State

915 So. 2d 234, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752, 2005 WL 3179577

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Booker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18803 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 1D05-4051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the motion for disqualification of Judge Frank Bell was timely and legally sufficient when the facts alleged therein are taken as true. The motion should have been granted and we therefore grant the petition for writ of prohibition, remanding the cause with directions to Judge Bell that he enter an order granfl ing the motion for disqualification.

PETITION GRANTED.

DAVIS, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that the motion for disqualification of Judge Frank Bell was timely and legally sufficient when the facts alleged therein are taken as true. The motion should have been granted and we therefore grant the petition for writ of prohibition, remanding the cause with directions to Judge Bell that he enter an order granfl ing the motion for disqualification.

PETITION GRANTED.

DAVIS, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Booker v. State, 915 So. 2d 234, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18752, 2005 WL 3179577 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

915 So. 2d 234 (Booker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.