Booker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Booker v. State

807 So. 2d 800, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 2002 WL 265867

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-1433

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 807 So. 2d 800 (Booker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booker v. State, 807 So. 2d 800, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 2002 WL 265867 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla.2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, J.

Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla.2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 So. 2d 800, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 2002 WL 265867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booker-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack