Booker v. State
807 So. 2d 800, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 2002 WL 265867
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2002·No. No. 1D01-1433·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla.2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Booker v. State, 807 So. 2d 800, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011, 2002 WL 265867 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
807 So. 2d 800 (Booker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornelius v. State
223 So. 3d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Clifton Cornelius v. State
223 So. 3d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Rodriguez v. Florida Parole Commission
973 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)