Booker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Booker v. State

655 So. 2d 169, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, 1995 WL 271501

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1995

DocketNo. 94-455

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 655 So. 2d 169 (Booker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booker v. State, 655 So. 2d 169, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, 1995 WL 271501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this 3.850 motion, disposed of without evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record demonstrating the defendant is not entitled to relief on the refusal to permit testimony issue, Holmes v. State, 650 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Remaining allegations are facially insufficient.

[170]*170Reversed and remanded in part, affirmed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this 3.850 motion, disposed of without evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record demonstrating the defendant is not entitled to relief on the refusal to permit testimony issue, Holmes v. State, 650 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Remaining allegations are facially insufficient.

[170]*170Reversed and remanded in part, affirmed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 So. 2d 169, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, 1995 WL 271501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booker-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack