Booker v. Heard & Sutton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Booker v. Heard & Sutton

96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 695

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 16, 1918

Docket9674

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 1048 (Booker v. Heard & Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booker v. Heard & Sutton, 96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The testimony admitted over objection was not material and necessary to the plaintiff's cause, and was harmless to the cause of the defendant. The evidence authorized the verdict against the defendant, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., ebneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The testimony admitted over objection was not material and necessary to the plaintiff's cause, and was harmless to the cause of the defendant. The evidence authorized the verdict against the defendant, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., ebneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 700, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booker-v-heard-sutton-gactapp-1918.