Booker v. Engelke

Fourth Circuit

Booker v. Engelke

669 F. App'x 166

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2016·No. No. 16-6428·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this eourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this eourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Booker v. Engelke, 669 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 166 (Booker v. Engelke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.