Booker v. Engelke

Fourth Circuit

Booker v. Engelke

669 F. App'x 166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 2016

DocketNo. 16-6428

StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 166 (Booker v. Engelke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booker v. Engelke, 669 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this eourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this eourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 F. App'x 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booker-v-engelke-ca4-2016.