Booker v. Chater

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 11, 1996·No. 95-60655·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 95-60655

(Summary Calendar) _________________

DONALD E BOOKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

July 2, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Donald E. Booker appeals the district court’s order

affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

(“Commissioner”) denying Brooker’s claim for Social Security

disability insurance benefits. Having carefully reviewed the

record, we find that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. substantial evidence and comports with relevant legal standards.

We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in the district

court’s memorandum opinion. See Booker v. Chater, No. 3:94-CV-

689WS (S.D. Miss. Sep. 25, 1995).

AFFIRMED

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booker v. Chater, (5th Cir. 1996).

Booker v. Chater (Booker v. Chater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.