Booker v. Chater
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 95-60655
(Summary Calendar) _________________
DONALD E BOOKER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SHIRLEY S CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi
July 2, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff Donald E. Booker appeals the district court’s order
affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security
(“Commissioner”) denying Brooker’s claim for Social Security
disability insurance benefits. Having carefully reviewed the
record, we find that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. substantial evidence and comports with relevant legal standards.
We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in the district
court’s memorandum opinion. See Booker v. Chater, No. 3:94-CV-
689WS (S.D. Miss. Sep. 25, 1995).
AFFIRMED
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Booker v. Chater (Booker v. Chater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.