Booker v. Board of Education of the Toledo City School District

District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided May 13, 2024·No. 3:22-cv-01233·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Stephanie Booker, Case No. 3:22-cv-1233

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Board of Education of Toledo City School District,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Stephanie Booker has filed a motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee. (Doc. No. 21). She seeks to argue that I erred in dismissing her claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (See Doc. No. 16). Section 1915 provides “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). A court may grant a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the issues are arguable on their merits, even if the petitioner cannot show a probability of success on the merits. See, e.g., Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F. Supp. 2d 750, 765 (E.D. Mich. 2002). I conclude the issues Booker raises are not frivolous, even if she is unlikely to succeed on appeal. Further, I conclude she has remedied the lack of clarity as to her financial status in her original motion. (See Doc. Nos. 19 and 20). Therefore, I grant her motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. No. 21). I deny her first motion, (Doc. No. 19), as moot. So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booker v. Board of Education of the Toledo City School District, (N.D. Ohio 2024).

Booker v. Board of Education of the Toledo City School District (Booker v. Board of Education of the Toledo City School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Ludwick
208 F. Supp. 2d 750 (E.D. Michigan, 2002)