Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick

220 N.E.2d 793, 18 N.Y.2d 708, 274 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1123
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur denied as unnecessary since the Federal constitutional question is discussed and passed upon in the opinion of the Court of Appeals (see 18 N Y 2d 71).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick, 220 N.E.2d 793, 18 N.Y.2d 708, 274 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1123 (N.Y. 1966).

220 N.E.2d 793 (Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Godek
112 Misc. 2d 512 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Calderon v. City of Buffalo
61 A.D.2d 323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Kistler v. Halsey
481 P.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1971)