Booher v. PERKINS RESTAURANT & BAKERY/RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.

11 So. 3d 1008, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9053, 2009 WL 1940753
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2009·No. 1D08-5083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding, in part, that the major contributing cause (MCC) of her need for surgery was not the workplace accident. We reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.

A JCC errs in determining an issue not before him. E.g., Reynolds v. Skagfield Corp., 887 So.2d 434, 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Claims that have not gone through the mediation process are not ripe for adjudication. Farnam v. U.S. Sugar Corp., 9 So.3d 41, 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). A JCC errs by addressing claims that are not ripe. Id.

Here, the MCC of the need for surgery was not before the JCC because, as Claimant conceded at the final hearing, Claimant had not included this surgery in her petition for benefits (PFB), pretrial stipulation, or trial memorandum. Moreover, the issue was not proeedurally ripe because, as it was not included in the PFB, and the mediation was on the issues raised in the PFB, it had not been mediated.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booher v. PERKINS RESTAURANT & BAKERY/RISK MANAGEMENT LTD., 11 So. 3d 1008, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9053, 2009 WL 1940753 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

11 So. 3d 1008 (Booher v. PERKINS RESTAURANT & BAKERY/RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrence v. AQUARIUS SALES & SERVICE, INC.
30 So. 3d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)