Boofer v. Lotz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Boofer v. Lotz

842 A.2d 333, 577 Pa. 12, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 66

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 17, 2004·No. Appeal 5 WAP 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February 2004, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED. The Commonwealth Court erred in granting appellee relief upon a claim neither preserved below nor raised on appeal. See Pa.R.C.P. 227.1(b); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see also Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Association, 562 Pa. 238, 754 A.2d 1255, 1259 (2000). The matter is remanded for review of the issues appellee properly raised and preserved for appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February 2004, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED. The Commonwealth Court erred in granting appellee relief upon a claim neither preserved below nor raised on appeal. See Pa.R.C.P. 227.1(b); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see also Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Association, 562 Pa. 238, 754 A.2d 1255, 1259 (2000). The matter is remanded for review of the issues appellee properly raised and preserved for appeal.

Boofer v. Lotz, 842 A.2d 333, 577 Pa. 12, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 66 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

842 A.2d 333 (Boofer v. Lotz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related