Boofer v. Lotz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Boofer v. Lotz

842 A.2d 333, 577 Pa. 12, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 66

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 17, 2004

DocketAppeal 5 WAP 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 842 A.2d 333 (Boofer v. Lotz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boofer v. Lotz, 842 A.2d 333, 577 Pa. 12, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 66 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February 2004, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED. The Commonwealth Court erred in granting appellee relief upon a claim neither preserved below nor raised on appeal. See Pa.R.C.P. 227.1(b); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see also Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Association, 562 Pa. 238, 754 A.2d 1255, 1259 (2000). The matter is remanded for review of the issues appellee properly raised and preserved for appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February 2004, the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED. The Commonwealth Court erred in granting appellee relief upon a claim neither preserved below nor raised on appeal. See Pa.R.C.P. 227.1(b); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see also Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Association, 562 Pa. 238, 754 A.2d 1255, 1259 (2000). The matter is remanded for review of the issues appellee properly raised and preserved for appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

842 A.2d 333, 577 Pa. 12, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boofer-v-lotz-pa-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack