Boody v. Lincoln National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Boody v. Lincoln National Bank

77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392

DecidedJune 15, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392 (Boody v. Lincoln National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boody v. Lincoln National Bank, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The sum of $4,440.50 on deposit with the Lincoln National Bank to the credit of A. B. Harris, agent, must be paid to the plaintiff, Ambia Boody, with no costs to any party.

Present-— Yan Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.

The sum of $4,440.50 on deposit with the Lincoln National Bank to the credit of A. B. Harris, agent, must be paid to the plaintiff, Ambia Boody, with no costs to any party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The sum of $4,440.50 on deposit with the Lincoln National Bank to the credit of A. B. Harris, agent, must be paid to the plaintiff, Ambia Boody, with no costs to any party.

Present-— Yan Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.

The sum of $4,440.50 on deposit with the Lincoln National Bank to the credit of A. B. Harris, agent, must be paid to the plaintiff, Ambia Boody, with no costs to any party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boody-v-lincoln-national-bank-nysupct-1893.