Boodt v. Borgess Medical Center
This text of 739 N.W.2d 334 (Boodt v. Borgess Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Melissa BOODT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Waltz, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER, Michael Andrew Lauer, M.D., and Heart Center for Excellence, P.C., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and
Michael Andrew Lauer, M.D., P.C., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applications or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court and holding that the notice of intent met the requirements of MCL 600.2912b with regard to defendant Lauer. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 N.W.2d 334, 480 Mich. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boodt-v-borgess-medical-center-mich-2007.