Boober v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided July 19, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01052·Unknown

Opinion

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEATTLE DIVISION LINDA A. BOOBER, Civil No. 2:20-cv-01052-RSM Plaintiff, vs. ORDER FOR EAJA FEES COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Based on the parties’ Stipulated Motion for EAJA fees, it is hereby ordered that $9,000.00 in attorney fees and $20.10 in expenses shall awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel, Robert A. Friedman. However, if the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Robert A. Friedman, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to him. DATED this _1_9_th_ day of _J_u_ly__, 2021. A _______________________________ RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - Office of the General Counsel

Presented by:

s/ Benjamin J. Groebner BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2494 Fax: (206) 615-2531 benjamin.groebner@ssa.gov

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - Office of the General Counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boober v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Boober v. Commissioner of Social Security (Boober v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)