Bontz v. Kansas

377 U.S. 162, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 84 S. Ct. 1186, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1367
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 4, 1964
Docket758
StatusPublished

This text of 377 U.S. 162 (Bontz v. Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bontz v. Kansas, 377 U.S. 162, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 84 S. Ct. 1186, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1367 (1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clinton v. Virginia
377 U.S. 158 (Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 U.S. 162, 12 L. Ed. 2d 213, 84 S. Ct. 1186, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bontz-v-kansas-scotus-1964.