Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp.

269 A.D.2d 483, 703 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2001
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 483 (Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp., 269 A.D.2d 483, 703 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 2, 1999, which, upon the granting of the respondents’ motion for judgment as a matter of law, made at the close of the evidence, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the, judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Joseph Bonsera (hereinafter the plaintiff) was hit by a truck while in a refuse transfer station in Glen Cove. Before the trial began, the plaintiff settled the case against the defendant truck driver and his corporation for $90,000. At the close of the liability phase of the trial, the remaining defendants, who owned and operated the transfer station, moved for judgment as a matter of law. The trial court properly granted the motion on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove that the remaining defendants were negligent or that, if they were negligent, their negligence was a substantial cause of the accident.

Where, as here, there is no causal connection between the design and maintenance of the premises and the plaintiff’s injuries, there is no liability against the remaining defendants (see, Margolin v Friedman, 43 NY2d 982; Weber v City of New York, 24 AD2d 618, affd 17 NY2d 790). The record reveals that the accident happened as a result of the truck driver’s failure to control his vehicle and that the premises “merely furnished the condition or occasion for the occurrence of the event rather than one of its causes” (Sheehan v City of New York, 40 NY2d 496, 503). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Portelli v. Garcia
195 Misc. 2d 217 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Long v. Cleary
273 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 483, 703 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonsera-v-universal-recycling-services-corp-nyappdiv-2000.