Bonomo v. Capitol City Lumber Co.
228 A.2d 501, 154 Conn. 714
Opinion
The question on this appeal involves an issue of fact, and the verdict of the jury was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bonomo v. Capitol City Lumber Co., 228 A.2d 501, 154 Conn. 714 (Colo. 1967).
228 A.2d 501 (Bonomo v. Capitol City Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeLucco v. Mott's Super Markets, Inc.
259 A.2d 646 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)