Bono & Bro. v. Orlow

94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1917·No. No. 190·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the court was authorized to grant an interlocutory injunction, but the injunction actually granted is in the form of a permanent injunction; and direction is given that it be so modified as to provide that the defendants are enjoined and restrained until the further hearing, so that upon the trial of the case it can be adjudged whether or not an injunction shall be granted under the law and facts. Beverly v. [389]*389942) ; Southern Railway Co. v. Planters Fertilizer Co., 134 Ga. 527 (68 S. E. 95).

No. 190. November 17, 1917. Injunction. Before Judge Thomas. Lowndes superior court. February 3, 1917. Franklin & Langdale, for plaintiffs in error. Patterson S Gopeland, contra.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bono & Bro. v. Orlow, 94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204 (Ga. 1917).

94 S.E. 251 (Bono & Bro. v. Orlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
156 S.E.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)