Bono & Bro. v. Orlow
This text of 94 S.E. 251 (Bono & Bro. v. Orlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the evidence in this case the court was authorized to grant an interlocutory injunction, but the injunction actually granted is in the form of a permanent injunction; and direction is given that it be so modified as to provide that the defendants are enjoined and restrained until the further hearing, so that upon the trial of the case it can be adjudged whether or not an injunction shall be granted under the law and facts. Beverly v. [389]*389942) ; Southern Railway Co. v. Planters Fertilizer Co., 134 Ga. 527 (68 S. E. 95).
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bono-bro-v-orlow-ga-1917.