Bono & Bro. v. Orlow

94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1917
DocketNo. 190
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 251 (Bono & Bro. v. Orlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bono & Bro. v. Orlow, 94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the court was authorized to grant an interlocutory injunction, but the injunction actually granted is in the form of a permanent injunction; and direction is given that it be so modified as to provide that the defendants are enjoined and restrained until the further hearing, so that upon the trial of the case it can be adjudged whether or not an injunction shall be granted under the law and facts. Beverly v. [389]*389942) ; Southern Railway Co. v. Planters Fertilizer Co., 134 Ga. 527 (68 S. E. 95).

No. 190. November 17, 1917. Injunction. Before Judge Thomas. Lowndes superior court. February 3, 1917. Franklin & Langdale, for plaintiffs in error. Patterson S Gopeland, contra.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
156 S.E.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 251, 147 Ga. 388, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bono-bro-v-orlow-ga-1917.