Bonnin v. Elliott

70 La. Ann. 322
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 15, 1867
DocketNo. 940
StatusPublished

This text of 70 La. Ann. 322 (Bonnin v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonnin v. Elliott, 70 La. Ann. 322 (La. 1867).

Opinion

Howell, J.

The motion to dismissthe appeal in this case is unfounded, ■ and must be overruled.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment, in the sum of one thous- and dollars damages, for Slander.

The words charged are clearly proven, s/aá are of a very defamatory nature ; but defendant’s counsel contends that they were uttered in an ebullition of passion, without malicious motive; and carry with them no pecuniary, responsibility. The circumstances detailed in the record, do not, in our opinion, bring this ease.within the application of -this doctrine. It is true, defendant gave .ven.t to a sudden, burst of passion ; but [323]*323there was nothing in the language or conduct of the plaintiff on the occasion, to diet or excuse it; while the opprobrious epithets were repeated, by him in plaintiff’s shop, and on the banquette, and one of them again used in an interview sometime afterwards with one of the witnesses. The ruling in the-case of Mohrman v. Oshe, 17 A. 64, supports the decision in this.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooper v. Boston & Maine Railroad
17 A. 64 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 La. Ann. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonnin-v-elliott-la-1867.