Bonnie Mayo v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
This text of 517 F. App'x 165 (Bonnie Mayo v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bonnie Jean Mayo appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders: (a) granting a motion to lift the automatic stay and (b) dismissing her Chapter 13 petition. We dismiss the appeal.
Where a sale of a bankrupt’s assets has not been stayed, an appeal challenging the sale’s validity is moot because “the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it would have determined the issues differently.” Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Miller (In re Stadium Mgmt. Corp.), 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir.1990) (collecting cases); see also In re Vlasek, 325 F.3d 955, 961-62 (7th Cir.2003) (same). Thus, even if the bankruptcy court erred in authorizing the sale, the appeal must be dismissed. See, e.g., Canzano v. Ragosa (In re Colarusso), 382 F.3d 51, 62 (1st Cir.2004).
Because Mayo failed to obtain a stay of the orders below, and the property has been sold and a state unlawful detainer action has been filed, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 F. App'x 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonnie-mayo-v-wells-fargo-home-mortgage-ca4-2013.