Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III
Opinion
Opinion issued May 19, 2005
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-03-01273-CV
____________
BONNIE FARRER, Appellant
V.
JAMES N. CLEM, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEROME L. FARRER JR., DECEASED, AND JAMES L. “ROMIE” FARRER III, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 26,428
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The existence of an actual controversy is essential to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. See Hallmark Pers. of Tex., Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ). After reviewing the record on appeal, including appellant’s Response to Order Dated March 31, 2005, we conclude that there is no longer a controversy between the parties. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III (Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.