Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III

DecidedMay 19, 2005

Docket01-03-01273-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III (Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonnie Farrer v. James N. Clem, Independent of the Estate of Jerome L. Farrer, Jr., and James L. "Romie" Farrer, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued May 19, 2005

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-03-01273-CV

BONNIE FARRER, Appellant

V.

JAMES N. CLEM, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEROME L. FARRER JR., DECEASED, AND JAMES L. “ROMIE” FARRER III, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 26,428

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The existence of an actual controversy is essential to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. See Hallmark Pers. of Tex., Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ). After reviewing the record on appeal, including appellant’s Response to Order Dated March 31, 2005, we conclude that there is no longer a controversy between the parties. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI