Bonney v. Bowman
63 Miss. 166
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The Chaucellor’s conclusion upon the facts is approved. The deeds were without consideration, and fraudulent and void as to creditors.
After judgment against him on the note, it was too late for the appellant to seek relief in chancery, because the note was given for an account many items of which were for spirituous liquors. Green v. Robinson, 5 How. 80; Glidewell v. Hite, Ib. 110; Thomas v. Phillips, 4 S. & M. 358.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bonney v. Bowman, 63 Miss. 166 (Mich. 1885).
63 Miss. 166 (Bonney v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Herbert
46 U.S. 72 (Supreme Court, 1847)