Bonnette Arc Lawn Sprinkler Co. v. Koehler

82 F. 428, 27 C.C.A. 200, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1980
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 11, 1897·No. No. 500·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal in a patent suit from a decree dismissing the bill on the ground that the defendant’s device does not infringe the patent sued on. Complainant and appellant is the owner, by assignment, of patent No. 461,415, issued to T. C. Bonnette, for a lawn sprinkler, October 20, 1891. It is said by the inventor in his specifications to be of that class of sprinklers in which a jet of water under pressure is distributed in the form of a spray over the lawn by rapidly revolving blades. One object of the invention, and the only one of importance in this case, is stated to be “to provide devices for distributing the water over a semicircular area -upon one side of the distributing point, whereby the water may be distributed from a point near a walk, fence, or building without wetting the [429]*429same.” The device may be best understood by reference to one of the drawings:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonnette Arc Lawn Sprinkler Co. v. Koehler, 82 F. 428, 27 C.C.A. 200, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1980 (6th Cir. 1897).

82 F. 428 (Bonnette Arc Lawn Sprinkler Co. v. Koehler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fones v. American Specialty Co.
38 F.2d 639 (D. Connecticut, 1930)
Beldam v. Garlock Packing Co.
29 F.2d 673 (Second Circuit, 1928)
Barber v. Otis Motor Sales Co.
240 F. 723 (Second Circuit, 1916)
Curry v. Union Electric Welding Co.
230 F. 422 (Sixth Circuit, 1916)
Zittlosen Mfg. Co. v. Boss
219 F. 887 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
J. L. Owens Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.
168 F. 259 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)
Kelsey Heating Co. v. James Spear Stove & Heating Co.
155 F. 976 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1907)