Bonner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bonner v. State

478 S.W.2d 101

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 29, 1972

DocketNos. 45066, 45067

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 478 S.W.2d 101 (Bonner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner v. State, 478 S.W.2d 101 (Tex. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

These are appeals from convictions of possession of heroin and possession of narcotic paraphernalia. Both cases were consolidated into one trial, and the appellant, after being duly admonished, entered pleas of guilty before the court and punishment was assessed at ten years in each case.

Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal, who was also appointed trial counsel, has filed an appellate brief reciting that after a careful and conscientious examination and re-examination of the entire record, he has concluded that the appeal is without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137. No [102]*102pro se brief has been filed. A copy of said brief was served on appellant.

An examination of the record reflects that appellant agreed and consented to a written waiver and consent to stipulation of testimony and stipulations which included a written confession to the ( commission of the offenses charged. We find no unassigned error which would require review in the interest of justice under Article 40.09, Sec. 13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

We find ourselves in full accord with counsel’s conclusion that these appeals are wholly without merit.

The judgments are affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI