Bonner v. State
This text of 157 S.W.3d 255 (Bonner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*256 ORDER
Laurence G. Bonner, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.W.3d 255, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968, 2004 WL 2940921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-state-moctapp-2004.