Bonner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bonner v. State

202 So. 3d 432, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18758

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 16, 2015

Docket3D15-1898

StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 3d 432 (Bonner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner v. State, 202 So. 3d 432, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18758 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Bonner (“Bonner”), appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and his Motion for Rehearing thereon. We affirm.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On March 1, 2001, in case number F01-18283, Bonner was found guilty, after a jury trial, on the charges of: count 1. burglary with a battery or assault; count 3. Battery; and count 4. kidnapping. Bonner was thereafter sentenced to consecutive life sentences on counts 1 and 4, and to 364 days in county jail on count 3. Bonner appealed his conviction and it was affirmed. See Bonner v. State, 868 So.2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Since that time, Bonner has filed numerous pro se motions challenging his convictions and sentences, all of which were denied. Bonner has also filed 12 appeals in his case, including six since 2011.¹ Those appeals include case number 3D14-184, which raised claims virtually identical to the claims raised in this appeal. As a result, we now order Bonner to show good cause within forty-five days from the date of this opinion why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se proceedings in this Court concerning his convic[433]*433tions and sentences in the above-cited case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Bonner (“Bonner”), appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and his Motion for Rehearing thereon. We affirm.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On March 1, 2001, in case number F01-18283, Bonner was found guilty, after a jury trial, on the charges of: count 1. burglary with a battery or assault; count 3. Battery; and count 4. kidnapping. Bonner was thereafter sentenced to consecutive life sentences on counts 1 and 4, and to 364 days in county jail on count 3. Bonner appealed his conviction and it was affirmed. See Bonner v. State, 868 So.2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Since that time, Bonner has filed numerous pro se motions challenging his convictions and sentences, all of which were denied. Bonner has also filed 12 appeals in his case, including six since 2011.¹ Those appeals include case number 3D14-184, which raised claims virtually identical to the claims raised in this appeal. As a result, we now order Bonner to show good cause within forty-five days from the date of this opinion why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se proceedings in this Court concerning his convic[433]*433tions and sentences in the above-cited case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 So. 3d 432, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack