Bonner v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bonner v. Smith

101 A.D.2d 1024, 476 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.2d 1024 (Bonner v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonner v. Smith, 101 A.D.2d 1024, 476 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously reversed and petition granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner was denied due process of law when his request to be present during the testimony of two inmates called on his behalf at a superintendent’s proceeding was denied without explanation (People ex rel. Selcov v Coughlin, 98 AD2d 733, 735; Matter of Tolden v Coughlin, 90 AD2d 929, 930). Accordingly, all references to the charges should be expunged from petitioner’s institutional records and 60 days lost “good time” restored to petitioner. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Wolfgang, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously reversed and petition granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner was denied due process of law when his request to be present during the testimony of two inmates called on his behalf at a superintendent’s proceeding was denied without explanation (People ex rel. Selcov v Coughlin, 98 AD2d 733, 735; Matter of Tolden v Coughlin, 90 AD2d 929, 930). Accordingly, all references to the charges should be expunged from petitioner’s institutional records and 60 days lost “good time” restored to petitioner. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Wolfgang, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 1024, 476 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonner-v-smith-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack